Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation

نویسنده

  • Stuart Glennan
چکیده

Philosophers of science principally associate the causal-mechanical view of scientific explanation with the work of Peter Railton and Wesley Salmon. In this paper I shall argue that the defects of this view arise from an inadequate analysis of the concept of mechanism. I contrast Salmon’s account of mechanisms in terms of the causal-nexus with my own account of mechanisms, in which mechanisms are viewed as complex systems. After describing these two concepts of mechanistic explanation, I show how the complex-systems approach to mechanism avoids certain objections that can be raised against Salmon’s version of the causal-mechanical approach. I conclude by discussing how mechanistic explanations in the complex systems approach can provide understanding by unification.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Explanation in Neurobiology: an Interventionist Perspective

Issues about explanation in psychology and neurobiology have received a great deal of philosophical attention lately. To a significant degree this reflects the impact of discussions of mechanism and mechanistic explanation in recent philosophy of science. Several writers (hereafter mechanists), including perhaps most prominently, Carl Craver and David Kaplan (Craver 2000, 2006; Kaplan and Crave...

متن کامل

The causal structure of mechanisms.

Recently, a number of philosophers of science have claimed that much explanation in the sciences, especially in the biomedical and social sciences, is mechanistic explanation. I argue the account of mechanistic explanation provided in this tradition has not been entirely satisfactory, as it has neglected to describe in complete detail the crucial causal structure of mechanistic explanation. I s...

متن کامل

Mechanistic explanation: Integrating the ontic and epistemic

Craver claims that mechanistic explanation is ontic, while Bechtel claims that it is epistemic. While this distinction between ontic and epistemic explanation originates with Salmon, the ideas have changed in the modern debate on mechanistic explanation, where the frame of the debate is changing. I will explore what Bechtel and Craver’s claims mean, and argue that good mechanistic explanations ...

متن کامل

The mechanistic approach of The Theory of Island Biogeography and its current relevance.

Philosophers of science have examined The Theory of Island Biogeography by Robert MacArthur and E. O. Wilson (1967) mainly due to its important contribution to modeling in ecology, but they have not examined it as a representative case of ecological explanation. In this paper, I scrutinize the type of explanation used in this paradigmatic work of ecology. I describe the philosophy of science of...

متن کامل

Heuristics , Descriptions , and the Scope of Mechanistic Explanation

The philosophical conception of mechanistic explanation is grounded on a limited number of canonical examples. These examples provide an overly narrow view of contemporary scientific practice, because they do not reflect the extent to which the heuristic strategies and descriptive practices that contribute to mechanistic explanation have evolved beyond the well-known methods of decomposition, l...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001